#SCIENCE

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. Does Fauci have a Napoleonic Complex? Well, he doesn't play well with others, not exactly a team player. That helps explain how he has held on to his bureaucratic

Fay Lin

xiaofei_lin

One of the reasons I'm leaving research after my PhD is because I had a past mentor early in grad school who treated me with complete unprofessionalism but got no

Genise Navidad

StevenGenise

Okay, a rant: The second part of this, the part where she explains that astronomy is an ancient science, is REALLY important. This falls under the myth category of “people

Dustin Moore, MS, RD

theamericanrd

Read this thread. Here's my 2¢ - you won't solve this by "better" science. Everyone, and I mean, EVERYONE assumes they are using the "right scientific reasoning" for the conclusions

Max Roser

MaxCRoser

1/ It is wrong to believe that the number of excess deaths is necessarily a good measure for COVID deaths.When the number of excess deaths is lower than the number

Esther Choo MD MPH

choo_ek

Below triple digits. This means the wild messages and conspiracy theories re: covid are going to get intense. A THREAD.https://twitter.com/PreetBharara/status/1288329309522886656 It's clear that a critical part of the Trump campaign

@SaysDana 🤓 🕷🕸

SaysDana

How about we just tell the truth. Like USPS and other institutions within our democracy, the KOCH supported Heartland Institute which has long been a purveyor of climate science denial,

Patrick Fafard

FafardPatrick

Two attempts to explain outcomes in the current pandemic, one is from public administration, the other from public health. 1/4 The first is an an attempt to explain crude death

AL 🙂

Metabo_PhD

1/n Lately, we have have been drowning in headlines stating that hospitals are bursting with COVID-19 patients.#whereiscovid#COVID19 #Coronavirus #lockdown #pandemic #science #fear #Canada #COVID19ontario #data #onpoli 2/n Many people are

Katie Mack

AstroKatie

There's a disconnect around the concept of "consensus" in science. People say: science would never advance if we trusted consensus.The point is: consensus is the best info experts have. If

Josh Wolfe

wolfejosh

1/ You cannot bepro sciencepro engineeringpro progresspro innovationpro truth—if you are not pro CRITICISM. Conjecture followed by criticism is how all of it is done. That which withstands crtiicsm on

Dan Berger

dnbrgr

Hi @GovInslee, I don't get it: People over 45 are 1/3 of the state's prison population but comprise almost half of those incarcerated who have tested positive for #Covid19. This

Anne Thériault

anne_theriault

I don’t know if I will articulate this quite right, but sometimes I think we place so much thought in what future selves will think of us (“what will the

Arrianna Marie Planey, PhD

Arrianna_Planey

"To “see” your blood, though, the light must pass through your skin. This should give us pause, since a range of technologies based on color sensing are known to reproduce

Dibyendu Nandi

ydnadydnad

In response, a thread on the many interconnected themes about data accessibility, data inclusivity and proprietary data (exclusivity) that makes this a complex issue. Let's ask the question: who owns

Chris Petrilli

PetrilliMD

Listen to science, and send kids back: A pediatrician on fear, risk and reality. Great article (and amazing work throughout this entire pandemic) by NYU Langone's Jen Lighter - Highlights

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.